<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Publishing / Academic literature / Scientific method / Peer review / Trials / Research ethics / Institutional review board / Committee on Publication Ethics / The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning / Academic publishing / Academia / Knowledge
Date: 2012-11-12 05:42:27
Publishing
Academic literature
Scientific method
Peer review
Trials
Research ethics
Institutional review board
Committee on Publication Ethics
The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Academic publishing
Academia
Knowledge

CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS Note: This document combines the original COPE Guidelines from 1999, the Code of Conduct developed in 2003, and the Best Practice Guidelines developed in 2

Add to Reading List

Source URL: publicationethics.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 520,19 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Version: cUniversity of Toronto Ethics Review Office  Teacher-Researcher Conflicts of Interest

Version: cUniversity of Toronto Ethics Review Office Teacher-Researcher Conflicts of Interest

DocID: 1vrm1 - View Document

Ethics Approval NoPARTICIPANT INFORMATION SHEET Carers NSW 2018 Carer Survey PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH This is an invitation to participate in a study conducted by Carers NSW in collaboration with

Ethics Approval NoPARTICIPANT INFORMATION SHEET Carers NSW 2018 Carer Survey PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH This is an invitation to participate in a study conducted by Carers NSW in collaboration with

DocID: 1vqRY - View Document

ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH ETHICS  SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE INTERNET – ALL IN THIS TOGETHER? Venue: Bristol University The Engine Shed

ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH ETHICS SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE INTERNET – ALL IN THIS TOGETHER? Venue: Bristol University The Engine Shed

DocID: 1voGF - View Document

Page 2 of 2 Ethics Renewal & Research Progress Report Form

DocID: 1vl8G - View Document

FORSCHUNGSETHIK / ETHIQUE DE LA RECHERCHE / RESEARCH ETHICS Point de vue Le silence des experts médicaux (3) La responsabilité publique des médecins au sujet de l’initiative «Protection contre le tabagisme passif»

FORSCHUNGSETHIK / ETHIQUE DE LA RECHERCHE / RESEARCH ETHICS Point de vue Le silence des experts médicaux (3) La responsabilité publique des médecins au sujet de l’initiative «Protection contre le tabagisme passif»

DocID: 1vipp - View Document