Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Cause of action / Copyright law of the United States / Civil procedure / Law / Grosso v. Miramax


Page[removed]F.Supp.2d 1196, 2008 Copr.L.Dec. P 29,525 (Cite as: 538 F.Supp.2d[removed]United States District Court, D. Arizona.
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-03-07 11:29:39


Open Document

File Size: 38,71 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Phoenix / Los Angeles / Chicago / /

Company

Houghton Mifflin Company / Skadden Arps / Harmon & Seidman LLC / Steptoe & Johnson LLP / Miramax Film Corp. / Defendant R.R. Donnelley and Sons Company / Thomson Reuters / Misys / R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company / /

Country

United States / /

IndustryTerm

textbook publisher / state law rights / state law / /

NaturalFeature

Colorado River / /

Organization

Copyright Office / Supplemental Authority / US Federal Reserve / United States District Court / F.D.I. C. / /

Person

Amy Marla Gardner / Peter Shawn Kozinets / JAMES A. TEILBORG / Maurice James Harmon / David R. Pehlke / Tom Bean / Christina M. Tchen / David Jeremy Bodney / /

Position

Governor / District Judge / speaker / General / professional photographer / /

ProvinceOrState

Illinois / Arizona / /

SocialTag