Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Medtronic /  Inc. v. Lohr / Law / United States / Medtronic / United States law / Federal preemption


No[removed]In the Supreme Court of the United States CHARLES R. RIEGEL, et al., Petitioners, v.
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2006-10-17 09:32:31


Open Document

File Size: 171,67 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Los Angeles / New York / /

Company

Surgidev Corp. / Buckman Co. / American Honda Motor Co. / Thoratec Corp. / Rowe & Maw LLP / STATEMENT Respondent Medtronic Inc. / Howmedica Inc. / Allergan / Iolab Corp. / New Womyn Inc. / Dow Agrosciences LLC / Telectronics Pacing Systems Inc. / Tambrands Inc. / Collagen Corp. / CASES American Airlines Inc. / MEDTRONIC INC. / M. BAIRD Reed Smith LLP / /

Country

United States / /

Event

FDA Phase / /

Facility

Supreme Court / /

IndustryTerm

federal law / state law claims arising / device technology / law claims arising / state law tort actions / state common law / /

Organization

Congress / Lohr Court / Food and Drug Administration / Supreme Court / US Federal Reserve / Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee / United States Court of Appeals / /

Person

DAVID M. GOSSETT ANDREW / Therese L. Tully / ANDREW E. TAUBER / Gregory J. Scandaglia / /

Position

KENNETH S. GELLER Counsel / Counsel / /

Product

Evergreen Dilatation Balloon / Medical Device Amendments / /

ProgrammingLanguage

DC / /

ProvinceOrState

Missouri / Pennsylvania / Rhode Island / Illinois / New York / California / Iowa / /

Technology

device technology / /

SocialTag