MANAGING ALLEGATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT: A Guidance Document for Editors

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2013-07-26 17:51:56 Academia Bibliography Academic publishing United States Office of Research Integrity Medical research Retraction Committee on Publication Ethics Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals Peer review Scientific misconduct Science Knowledge		MANAGING ALLEGATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT: A Guidance Document for Editors Add to Reading List Source URL: ori.hhs.gov Download Document from Source Website File Size: 106,43 KB Share Document on Facebook

	The Committee on Publication Ethics Flowcharts Chest 2010;137;DOIchestThe online version of this article, along with updated information and services can be found online on the World Wide Web at DocID: 1ubj8 - View Document
	CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should: • Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work wit DocID: 1u8Vq - View Document
	Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Elizabeth Wager, Virginia Barbour, Steven Yentis, Sabine Kleinert on behalf of COPE Council Summary DocID: 1u8qK - View Document
	Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie (ZfPP) Statement on Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice The Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie (ZfPP) follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practi DocID: 1u822 - View Document
	Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement The publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement are mainly based on the Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (Committee on Publication DocID: 1tKfA - View Document