<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
United States evidence law / Evidence / Affidavit / Privilege / Business records exception / Hearsay in English law / Outline of evidence law in the United States / Law / Evidence law / Hearsay
Date: 2014-08-06 00:10:00
United States evidence law
Evidence
Affidavit
Privilege
Business records exception
Hearsay in English law
Outline of evidence law in the United States
Law
Evidence law
Hearsay

Australian Capital Territory Evidence Act 2011 A2011-12 Contents

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.legislation.act.gov.au

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 630,82 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Hearsay / United States evidence law / Evidence / Witness / Confession / Character evidence / Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor / Right to silence / Hearsay in English law / Law / Evidence law / Criminal procedure

General Sections Discretion to Exclude General discretion to exclude evidence The court may refuse to admit evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger that the evidence might—

DocID: 18MnN - View Document

Expert witness / Jury / Hearsay in English law / Law / Evidence law / Evidence

Microsoft Word - IP26.doc

DocID: 18GHa - View Document

Evidence / Hearsay / Expert witness / Witness / Hearsay in English law / Evidence law / Law / Common law

Queensland Evidence Act 1977 Current as at 5 September 2014

DocID: 189VC - View Document

Evidence / Relevance / Testimony / Confession / Witness / Hearsay in English law / Hearsay in United States law / Law / Evidence law / Hearsay

Index Relevance Definition (s 55). If irrelevant, inadmissible (s 56). Direct vs Circumstantial evidence (e.g. Smith v R; Plomp; Shepherd). Can also exclude using ss 135-7.

DocID: 180U6 - View Document

Evidence / Right to silence / Hearsay / No case to answer / Hearsay in English law / Confession / Law / Criminal procedure / Evidence law

CHARACTER OF ACCUSED - (CRIMINAL CASES ONLY) - Other dangers for the Accused under s110 s112 - Where the accused chooses to give sworn evidence, then (subject to leave: Stanoevski) they open themselves to being cross-e

DocID: 17DK0 - View Document