U.S.A. Inc. / THE GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL / Mead / Coronado Oil & Gas Co. / Chevron / /
Country
United States / /
Event
Person Communication and Meetings / /
Facility
Michigan State University College of Law / /
IndustryTerm
evidence law / substantive law context / federal common law / important tool / case law / important interpretive tool / particular interpretive tools / /
Organization
Supreme Court / CORNELL / YALE / Lower Court / Congress / office of Legislative / Michigan State University College of Law / UN Court / ON CONGRESS / Mary Law School / /
Person
Victoria F. Nourse / Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz / Jordan Wilder Connors / Chad M. Oldfather / EVAN J. CRIDDLE / Chad Oldfather / Philip P. Frickey / Neal Devins / Bill Eskridge / Allison Larsen / Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl / Joseph A. Grundfest / Max Radin / Abbe Gluck / William N. Eskridge / Jr. / Jonathan R. Siegel / Stephen F. Ross / Michael Sant’Ambrogio / Sydney Foster / Frank H. Easterbrook / B. Similarly / GLEN STASZEWSKI / MARY L. REV / Jane S. Schacter / Lisa Schultz Bressman / Lisa Bressman / Adrian Vermeule / John F. Manning / Jacob Scott / /
Position
Counsel / Professor of Law / author / Professor / congressional counsel / Associate Dean for Research / Legislative Counsel / Private / judge / /
ESSAY Against Methodological Stare Decisis EVAN J. CRIDDLE* & GLEN STASZEWSKI** Should federal courts give stare decisis effect to statutory interpretation methodology? Although a growing number of legal scholars have an