Alia

Results: 494



#Item
321On March 22, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, reversed and remanded the district court’s dismissal under FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) of Schreiber’s suit alleging infringement of U.S. Patents No. 5,440,860 and No. 5,7

On March 22, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, reversed and remanded the district court’s dismissal under FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) of Schreiber’s suit alleging infringement of U.S. Patents No. 5,440,860 and No. 5,7

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-03-30 13:28:17
322On August 2, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, reversed the district court’s judgment as a matter of law and reinstated the jury verdict that ApplyYourself infringed U.S. Patents No. 6,345,278 and No. 6,460,042, w

On August 2, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, reversed the district court’s judgment as a matter of law and reinstated the jury verdict that ApplyYourself infringed U.S. Patents No. 6,345,278 and No. 6,460,042, w

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-08-05 21:33:29
323On June 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, affirmed the district court’s judgment entering the jury verdict that Atlas did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,439,346, which related to turbine grinder rotary speed go

On June 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, affirmed the district court’s judgment entering the jury verdict that Atlas did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,439,346, which related to turbine grinder rotary speed go

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-07-01 10:06:23
324On August 2, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, vacated and remanded the district court’s judgment that U.S. Patent No. 5,727,236, which related to a camera lens, was unenforceable for inequitable conduct and the a

On August 2, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, vacated and remanded the district court’s judgment that U.S. Patent No. 5,727,236, which related to a camera lens, was unenforceable for inequitable conduct and the a

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-08-05 21:33:39
325On March 16, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed, inter alia, the district court’s partial summary judgment that U.S. Patent No. 6,396,273, which related to radio frequency coils for magnetic resonance imaging, was inva

On March 16, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed, inter alia, the district court’s partial summary judgment that U.S. Patent No. 6,396,273, which related to radio frequency coils for magnetic resonance imaging, was inva

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-03-30 13:27:01
326On September 30, 2005, the Federal Circuit inter alia vacated the district court’s permanent injunction enjoining Medtronic from infringing claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 5,474,555, which related to orthopedic surgical imp

On September 30, 2005, the Federal Circuit inter alia vacated the district court’s permanent injunction enjoining Medtronic from infringing claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 5,474,555, which related to orthopedic surgical imp

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-10-10 20:30:54
327General Conditions of Purchase Ecore Belgium 1 ACCEPTATION OF THE GENERAL CONDITIONS The acceptation of an order (an “Order”) for goods or services with immediate or successive performance, including inter alia purch

General Conditions of Purchase Ecore Belgium 1 ACCEPTATION OF THE GENERAL CONDITIONS The acceptation of an order (an “Order”) for goods or services with immediate or successive performance, including inter alia purch

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.ecore.com

Language: English - Date: 2014-01-27 03:35:33
328ANNEX 4 Duly justified circumstances In general:

ANNEX 4 Duly justified circumstances In general: "Duly justified circumstances" exist inter alia where there is a situation which

Add to Reading List

Source URL: ec.europa.eu

Language: English - Date: 2013-03-01 06:06:46
329On March 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, vacated-in-part, affirmed-inpart and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that P&G did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 4,536,178, which related to a tampon appl

On March 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, vacated-in-part, affirmed-inpart and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that P&G did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 4,536,178, which related to a tampon appl

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-03-30 13:24:12
330On January 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that, inter alia, Mattel did not infringe U.S. Patents No. 5,308,080 and No. 5,419,564, whic

On January 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that, inter alia, Mattel did not infringe U.S. Patents No. 5,308,080 and No. 5,419,564, whic

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-01-07 14:35:54