Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Scientific method / Scientific misconduct / Plagiarism / Peer review / Research / Alternative medicine / Retraction / Science / Knowledge / Academic publishing


survey Science Fraud: The Hard Figures One in twelve medical scientists in Flanders admits to making up or ‘massaging’ data in order for it to match a hypothesis. And almost six in twelve see such fraudulent practic
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2013-03-20 10:33:26


Open Document

File Size: 792,44 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Amsterdam / /

Company

Eos Magazine / RetractionWatch. com / /

Country

Netherlands / /

Event

Product Issues / /

Facility

University of Leuven / University Free University of Brussels*2 / University of Antwerpen / University of Hasselt*3 / Radboud University / University of Ghent / VU University Medical Center / Plagiarism Fraud Authorship Other*1 Remark University of Antwerp / University of Hasselt / Free University of Brussels / /

IndustryTerm

pharmaceutical industry / plagiarism software / pharmaceutical / /

Organization

Free University of Brussels / Committee on Publication Ethics / VU University Medical Center Amsterdam / University of Hasselt / University of Hasselt*3 / University of Antwerp / University of Ghent / United Nations / University of Antwerpen / University of Leuven / Pascal Decroos Fund for Investigative Journalism / Radboud University / University Free University of Brussels*2 / /

Person

Ivan Oransky / Brian Martinson / Mohammed Ali / Reinout Verbeke / Frank van Kolfschooten / Daniele Fanelli / Luca Consoli / Joeri Tijdink / André Van Steirteghem / /

/

Position

author / editor / honorary author / journalist / social psychologist / assistant professor / financier / co-author / last author / Psychiatrist and researcher / secretary / head of the lab / valid co-author / science journalist / /

Product

data / /

PublishedMedium

PloS ONE / Eos Magazine / /

SocialTag