Recognizing Microstructural Fallacies in Argumentation and Public Advocacy

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2012-08-10 16:48:17 Rhetoric Statistics Genetic fallacies Informal fallacies Fallacy Hasty generalization Argumentum ad baculum Correlation does not imply causation Post hoc ergo propter hoc Critical thinking Logic Logical fallacies		Recognizing Microstructural Fallacies in Argumentation and Public Advocacy Add to Reading List Source URL: www.indiana.edu Download Document from Source Website File Size: 673,88 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Texto para Discussão 004 \| 2018 Discussion Paper 004 \| 2018 Economic liberalization and the fallacy of Postneoliberalism in Latin America Reinaldo Gonçalves DocID: 1vjzs - View Document
	The Subject Matter Fallacy John Perry 1 Introduction DocID: 1uMsN - View Document
	The Follower Count Fallacy: Detecting Twitter Users with Manipulated Follower Count Anupama Aggarwal Saravana Kumar DocID: 1uJ5e - View Document
	The Big Extract Fallacy: Extract Beers are Inferior to All Grain Beers. The Reasons You Hear Extract Beer is Inferior: Extract tastes like extract, aka Bad. You can’t do light beers. You have no control over the beer. DocID: 1uH3a - View Document
	The Subject Matter Fallacy John Perry 1 Introduction DocID: 1uye5 - View Document