Editorial: Single- Versus Double-Blind Reviewing Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona This editorial analyzes from a variety of perspectives the controversial issue of single-blind versus double-blind reviewing. In

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2006-12-12 18:04:08 Academic publishing Scientific method Publishing Knowledge Science Scholarly peer review Blinded experiment Academic journal Bias Richard T. Snodgrass Scientific journal		Editorial: Single- Versus Double-Blind Reviewing Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona This editorial analyzes from a variety of perspectives the controversial issue of single-blind versus double-blind reviewing. In Add to Reading List Source URL: history.acm.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 256,50 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Small or medium-scale focused research project (STREP) ICT SME-DCA Call 2013 FP7-ICT-2013-SME-DCA Data Publishing through the Cloud: A Data- and Platform-as-a-Service Approach to Efficient DocID: 1xW2B - View Document
	Small or medium-scale focused research project (STREP) ICT SME-DCA Call 2013 FP7-ICT-2013-SME-DCA Data Publishing through the Cloud: A Data- and Platform-as-a-Service Approach to Efficient DocID: 1xVUv - View Document
	Small or medium-scale focused research project (STREP) ICT SME-DCA Call 2013 FP7-ICT-2013-SME-DCA Data Publishing through the Cloud: A Data- and Platform-as-a-Service Approach to Efficient DocID: 1xVJM - View Document
	U Network: A Decentralized Protocol for Publishing and Valuing Online Content White Paper Version 1.0.3 DocID: 1xVrI - View Document
	Small or medium-scale focused research project (STREP) ICT SME-DCA Call 2013 FP7-ICT-2013-SME-DCA Data Publishing through the Cloud: A Data- and Platform-as-a-Service Approach to Efficient DocID: 1xVqf - View Document