Chief Diversity Officers: Leading and Engaging in Campus Deliberations on Post-Fisher Admissions Strategies Executive Summary 1. Our intent in this document is to provide NADOHE members with practical

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2016-04-13 13:43:59 University and college admissions University of Texas at Austin Civil rights and liberties United States constitutional law Social inequality Fisher v. University of Texas Grutter v. Bollinger Regents of the University of California v. Bakke Equal Protection Clause Suspect classification Affirmative action Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution		Chief Diversity Officers: Leading and Engaging in Campus Deliberations on Post-Fisher Admissions Strategies Executive Summary 1. Our intent in this document is to provide NADOHE members with practical Add to Reading List Source URL: nadohe.memberclicks.net Download Document from Source Website File Size: 754,77 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Microsoft Word - 5222287_7.DOCX DocID: 1qcyc - View Document
	Mismatch in Law School † Jesse Rothstein * Princeton University and NBER and DocID: 1pAym - View Document
	Chief Diversity Officers: Leading and Engaging in Campus Deliberations on Post-Fisher Admissions Strategies Executive Summary 1. Our intent in this document is to provide NADOHE members with practical DocID: 1pdih - View Document
	A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action DocID: 1oYAI - View Document
	File: 2 Rothstein Final 6.8 Created on: :49:00 PM Last Printed: :05:00 PM DocID: 1oN5B - View Document