Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Skidmore v. Swift & Co. / Taxation in the United States / United Kingdom / BAE Systems / British Aerospace


Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made befo
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2012-11-29 14:08:56


Open Document

File Size: 280,22 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Washington / /

Company

Washington Gas Light Co. / Peoples Drug Stores Inc. / BAE Systems Enterprise Systems Inc. / See School St. Assocs. Ltd. / Swift & Co. / School St. Assocs. Ltd. / V. BAE SYSTEMS ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS INC. / Qualified High Technology Company / /

Country

United States / /

Currency

USD / /

IndustryTerm

specified high-technology activities / computer software / government-owned equipment / telephone listing / informationtechnology products / /

Organization

10-AA-1071 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF TAX / federal government / COURT OF APPEALS / UN Court / District of Columbia office of Administrative Hearings / OTR / OFFICE OF TAX / /

Person

Andrew Van Brisker / Gonzales / Harold J. Heltzer / Todd S. Kim / Mary L. Wilson / Donna M. Murasky / Robert L. Willmore / Irvin B. Nathan / /

Position

Solicitor General / Assistant Attorney General / Clerk / Senior Assistant Attorney General / Attorney General for the District of Columbia / Judge / Deputy Solicitor General / /

ProvinceOrState

Columbia Bd. / Virginia / DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / Columbia Zoning Comm’n / Columbia Office / Columbia Dep’t / Oregon / Connecticut / COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. / /

SocialTag