Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Tort / Damages / Intentional infliction of emotional distress / Punitive damages / Conflict of tort laws / Benjamin Zipursky / English tort law / Law / Tort law / Private law


Civil Recourse Defended: A Reply to Posner, Calabresi, Rustad, Chamallas, and Robinette JOHN C. P. GOLDBERG* BENJAMIN C. ZIPURSKY** INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-10-26 02:27:42


Open Document

File Size: 368,16 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

OXFORD / /

Company

Philip Morris USA / INDIANA LAW JOURNAL / /

Country

United States / /

IndustryTerm

case law / longer tort law / tort law / negligence law / criminal law / law students / contract law / regulatory law / /

Organization

U.S. Supreme Court / Harvard Law School / Supreme Court / CORNELL / YALE / Fordham University School of Law / Executive Committee / Association of American Law Schools / /

Person

Michael Rustad / Criticisms Posner / Andrew Robertson / Anthony J. Sebok / Donal Nolan / WILLIAM M. LANDES / Andrew S. Gold / Richard Posner / Jules Coleman / Scott Shapiro / MARY L. REV / Quinn Chair / James H. Quinn / JOHN C. P. GOLDBERG / BENJAMIN C. ZIPURSKY / Christopher Robinette / Robert Rabin / Jane Stapleton / Professors Martha Chamallas / Guido Calabresi / Richard A. Posner / /

Position

attorney / Professor of Law / government official / General / Private / Judge / /

ProvinceOrState

Virginia / Indiana / Florida / Arizona / Connecticut / /

URL

http /

SocialTag