Recent Progress in Linear Algebra and Lattice Basis Reduction Gilles Villard CNRS, ENS de Lyon, INRIA, UCBL, Université de Lyon Laboratoire LIP

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2017-06-27 04:39:37 Mathematics Algebra Cryptography Computational number theory Lattice points Linear algebra Lattice-based cryptography Lattice reduction LenstraLenstraLovsz lattice basis reduction algorithm Hermite normal form Euclidean algorithm Integer relation algorithm		Recent Progress in Linear Algebra and Lattice Basis Reduction Gilles Villard CNRS, ENS de Lyon, INRIA, UCBL, Université de Lyon Laboratoire LIP Add to Reading List Source URL: perso.ens-lyon.fr Download Document from Source Website File Size: 130,39 KB Share Document on Facebook

	An algorithm for realizing Euclidean distance matrices Jorge Alencar 1 Instituto Federal de Educa¸c˜ ao, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais, Inconfidentes, MG, Brazil DocID: 1uZU2 - View Document
	A COMPLETE WORST-CASE ANALYSIS OF KANNAN’S SHORTEST LATTICE VECTOR ALGORITHM ´† GUILLAUME HANROT∗ AND DAMIEN STEHLE Abstract. Computing a shortest nonzero vector of a given euclidean lattice and computing a closes DocID: 1uAnv - View Document
	THE EUCLIDEAN ALGORITHM IN ALGEBRAIC NUMBER FIELDS FRANZ LEMMERMEYER Abstract. This article, which is an update of a version published 1995 in Expo. Math., intends to survey what is known about Euclidean number fields; DocID: 1uads - View Document
$Notes on continued fractions 1. Chapter 49: The Topsy-turvy world of continued fractions First, let’s go back, way back, to the Euclidean algorithm. Let’s say for 23 and 5. If we run this through we get 23 = 4 ∗ 5$	Notes on continued fractions 1. Chapter 49: The Topsy-turvy world of continued fractions First, let’s go back, way back, to the Euclidean algorithm. Let’s say for 23 and 5. If we run this through we get 23 = 4 ∗ 5 DocID: 1tH6y - View Document
	Research Article Climbing the Steiner Tree—Sources of Active Information in a Genetic Algorithm for Solving the Euclidean Steiner Tree Problem Winston Ewert,1* William Dembski,2 Robert J. Marks II1 DocID: 1tff1 - View Document