<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Juries / Blakely v. Washington / United States v. Booker / Apprendi v. New Jersey / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / Mandatory sentencing / Presentence investigation report / United States Sentencing Commission / Sentence / Law / United States criminal procedure / Criminal procedure
Date: 2008-08-20 17:05:37
Juries
Blakely v. Washington
United States v. Booker
Apprendi v. New Jersey
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Mandatory sentencing
Presentence investigation report
United States Sentencing Commission
Sentence
Law
United States criminal procedure
Criminal procedure

36 ARIZONA STATE LAW JOURNAL [Ariz. St. L.J.

Add to Reading List

Source URL: sentencing.typepad.com

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 266,00 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Singapore, 6th of July 2017 Jury corps for IYPT 2017  Experienced jurors who have already been in IYPT juries in the previous years

DocID: 1ukWu - View Document

Trial by Machine ANDREA ROTH* This Article explores the rise of “machines” in criminal adjudication. Human witnesses now often give way to gadgets and interpretive software, juries’ complex judgments about moral bl

DocID: 1sULo - View Document

Portfolio Media. Inc. | 111 West 19th Street, 5th Floor | New York, NY 10011 | www.law360.com Phone: + | Fax: + | Halo Gives Juries Bigger Role On Enhanced Patent Da

DocID: 1sIIg - View Document

2006 UCLA J.L. & Tech. 3 JUDGING JURIES: EVALUATING RENEWED PROPOSALS FOR SPECIALIZED JURIES FROM A PUBLIC CHOICE PERSPECTIVE Beth Z. Shaw ABSTRACT This article evaluates whether specialized juries are better in dealing

DocID: 1sdJq - View Document

feature article Representative Juries: Examining the Initial and Eligible Pools of Juries by Elizabeth Neeley, Ph.D.

DocID: 1rRtx - View Document