First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
Date: 2008-10-02 08:10:58Blakely v. Washington United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Apprendi v. New Jersey Stinson v. United States Mistretta v. United States Mandatory sentencing National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Rita v. United States United States v. Booker Law Case law United States criminal procedure | Nos[removed]and[removed]IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________Add to Reading ListSource URL: pracdl.typepad.comDownload Document from Source WebsiteFile Size: 208,31 KBShare Document on Facebook |
Microsoft Word - Responses_Blakely v Washington.docDocID: 1uTN7 - View Document | |
RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document | |
DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT STATEMENTS, O’CONNOR’S WARNING, AND THE MYSTERIES OF PRISON RELEASE: TOPICS FROM A SENTENCING REFORM AGENDA Kevin R. Reitz∗ I.DocID: 1aJGU - View Document | |
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No_____________DocID: 19veD - View Document | |
The Feeney Pit and the Pendulum: Swings in Criminalizing Securities LawsDocID: 141Ic - View Document |