<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Criminal law / Mitigating factor / Apprendi v. New Jersey / Blakely v. Washington / Jury / Cunningham v. California / Ring v. Arizona / Law / Case law / United States criminal procedure
Date: 2013-05-28 16:40:25
Criminal law
Mitigating factor
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Blakely v. Washington
Jury
Cunningham v. California
Ring v. Arizona
Law
Case law
United States criminal procedure

ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BULLETIN NO[removed] | AUGUST 2012 Sentencing for Impaired Driving under G.S[removed]

Add to Reading List

Source URL: sogpubs.unc.edu

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 1,03 MB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Sentencing / Apprendi v. New Jersey / Mandatory sentencing / Jury / Cunningham v. California / Ring v. Arizona / Law / Case law / Government

To: New Jersey Law Revision Commission From: Mark J. Leszczyszak Re: Unlawful Possession of Weapons (N.J.S. § 2C:39-5(i)) Date: February 19, 2015

DocID: 1ai8d - View Document

To: New Jersey Law Revision Commission From: Mark J. Leszczyszak Re: Unlawful Possession of Weapons (N.J.S. § 2C:39-5(i)) Date: February 19, 2015 MEMORANDUM

To: New Jersey Law Revision Commission From: Mark J. Leszczyszak Re: Unlawful Possession of Weapons (N.J.S. § 2C:39-5(i)) Date: February 19, 2015 MEMORANDUM

DocID: 19Nef - View Document

OCTOBER TERM, Syllabus

OCTOBER TERM, Syllabus

DocID: 18ln2 - View Document

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No___________________________ Roderick Nunley

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No___________________________ Roderick Nunley

DocID: 12Mnw - View Document

[removed]HURST V. FLORIDA DECISION BELOW: 147 So.3d 435 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: SC12-1947 QUESTION PRESENTED:  WHETHER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CORRECTLY HELD THAT THE JURY IN A DEATH

[removed]HURST V. FLORIDA DECISION BELOW: 147 So.3d 435 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: SC12-1947 QUESTION PRESENTED: WHETHER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CORRECTLY HELD THAT THE JURY IN A DEATH

DocID: 10UOy - View Document