First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
Date: 2004-10-21 09:42:22Juries Apprendi v. New Jersey Blakely v. Washington Ring v. Arizona United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Plea bargain United States v. Booker Oregon v. Ice Law Case law United States criminal procedure | IB-ExecptSentenceSep2004-SHW.inddAdd to Reading ListSource URL: www.senate.state.tx.usDownload Document from Source WebsiteFile Size: 912,71 KBShare Document on Facebook |
RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document | |
Case: Document: Page: 1DocID: 1pL6K - View Document | |
JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as theDocID: 1os0A - View Document | |
Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNWDocID: 1my60 - View Document | |
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISHDocID: 1ll9b - View Document |