Ink Inc. / Chevron U.S.A. Inc. / Teva Pharm / Tool Works Inc. / Teleflex Will 1048 Texas Law Review / Supply Inc. / 1046 Texas Law Review / Council Inc. / Molins PLC / PATENT APPEALS & INTERFERENCES / Patent Appeals / J.E.M. Ag / Mead Corp. / Texas Law Review / USPTO / Textron Inc. / See Merck & Co. / Eli Lilly & Co. / /
Country
United States / /
Currency
USD / /
Event
Patent Issuance / /
Facility
U.S. District Court / The University of Texas School / Supreme Court / University of Akron School / University of Texas School / /
IndustryTerm
law literature discussing split-authority models / chemical substance needs / law enabling statute / substantive patent law / distinct technologies / case law / substantive patent law doctrines / antitrust law / law regime / patent-law substance / utility-patent applications / patent law / chemical / patent law features / /
NaturalFeature
Pacific coast / /
Organization
USPTO Authority / UCLA / Binding USPTO Authority / Court of Customs / Antitrust Division / Patent and Trademark Office / Univ. of Chi / Supreme Court / U.S. Patent and Trademark Office / U.S. Patent & Trademark Office / United States Patent & Trademark Office / Hybrid Interpretive Authority / Federal Trade Commission / University of Akron School of Law / Department of Justice / Patent Office / Congress / University of Texas School of Law / U.S. Congress / U.S. Supreme Court / federal government / U.S. Court of Appeals / Hybrid Interpretive Authority U.S. / he Antitrust Division / US Federal Reserve / Board of Patent Appeals / University of Texas School of Law’s Drawing Board / national legislature / U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.38 In / Equal Employment Opportunity Commission / Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences / /
Person
Craig Allen Nard / Dan Rodriguez / Semi-Specialized Courts / M. Elizabeth Magill / Ronen Avraham / Jeffrey A. Lefstin / Todd Rakoff / Sector Approaches / David B. Gornish / Mark Gergen / DAN L. BURK / MARK A. LEMLEY / Bernie Black / Sherman Act / Kelly Casey Mulally / Joseph Scott Miller / Daniel A. Crane / Cooper Techs / Michael J. Burstein / Hillary Greene / Jonathan S. Masur / Jeffrey Manns / David Adelman / MICHAEL J. MEURER / JAMES BESSEN / Matt Spitzer / Oren Bracha / MARY L. REV / John M. Golden / Arti K. Rai / Theresa Stadheim / ROBERT PATRICK MERGES / Tom Cotter / Joshua Sarnoff / /
Position
Colonel / Professor / Director / Commissioner / Institutional Actor / subordinate and hopeful adviser / /
Articles Patentable Subject Matter and Institutional Choice John M. Golden* Given the existence of fine-grained requirements for patentability such as nonobviousness, the utility of a separate requirement of patentable s