Appalachian Power Co. / RE USGEN NEW ENGLAND INC. / E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co. / Dantran Inc. / U.S. Steel / U.S.A. Inc. / VOLUME 11 USGEN NEW ENGLAND INC. / Avon / Earth Inc. / Riverkeeper Inc. / Marathon Oil Co. / Utility Water Act Group / Ashland / B.J. Carney Industries / USGEN NEW ENGLAND INC. / Chevron / /
Country
United States / /
Event
Product Issues / Product Recall / Person Communication and Meetings / /
Facility
Circuit Court of Appeals / USGen’s Brayton Point Station / INC. BRAYTON POINT STATION / BRAYTON POINT STATION / USGen’s power plant / Ashland Wastewater Treatment Facility / /
IndustryTerm
conventional pollutant control technology / permit applications / demonstrated control technology / case law / /
NaturalFeature
Narragansett Bay / Taunton river / /
Organization
United States Environmental Protection Agency / Supreme Court / Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection / Seacoast court / Union of Concerned Scientists / Congress / Seacoast Anti-Pollution League / Federal government / Nuclear Regulatory Commission / CWM court / Conservation Law Foundation / Court of Appeals / Anti-Pollution League / US Federal Reserve / Proposed and Final Rules / U.S. Department of Labor / Friends of the Earth / CWM / /
Person
Lee Rivers / Scott C. Fulton / Reich / Kathie A. Stein / /
Position
President / appropriate Regional Administrator / Regional Administrator / Attorney General of the State of Rhode / Administrator / Judge / /
USGEN NEW ENGLAND, INC. BRAYTON POINT STATION 525 IN RE USGEN NEW ENGLAND, INC. BRAYTON POINT STATION