Expert Commentary Series Andrew Wakefield Has Never Been “Exonerated”: Why Justice Mitting’s Decision in the Professor John Walker-Smith Case Does Not Apply to Wakefield by Joel A. Harrison, PhD, MPH August 1, 2016

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2016-08-01 14:00:15 MMR vaccine controversy Medicine Health Health fraud Andrew Wakefield Brian Deer John Walker-Smith Vaccine controversies MMR vaccine The Lancet Jenny McCarthy Mumps		Expert Commentary Series Andrew Wakefield Has Never Been “Exonerated”: Why Justice Mitting’s Decision in the Professor John Walker-Smith Case Does Not Apply to Wakefield by Joel A. Harrison, PhD, MPH August 1, 2016 Add to Reading List Source URL: www.ecbt.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 592,33 KB Share Document on Facebook

	TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NOCV Dr. Andrew J. Wakefield, MB, BS, Appellant v. DocID: 1rEiS - View Document
	Cause No. D-1-GNDr Andrew J. Wakefield, MB., BS., § FRCS, § § Plaintiff, DocID: 1r7c4 - View Document
	Expert Commentary Series Andrew Wakefield Has Never Been “Exonerated”: Why Justice Mitting’s Decision in the Professor John Walker-Smith Case Does Not Apply to Wakefield by Joel A. Harrison, PhD, MPH August 1, 2016 DocID: 1r6XO - View Document
	Contact: Tim Gallen & Andrew Neilly Gallen.Neilly Office & DocID: 1qQ8G - View Document
	VolumeDecember 2013 CONTENTS DocID: 1qrMg - View Document