Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Science and technology studies / Actor-network theory / Science studies / Modernism / Bruno Latour / Politics of Nature / We Have Never Been Modern / Modernity / Steven Shapin / Science / Knowledge / Sociology of scientific knowledge


Social Epistemology Vol. 20, No. 2, April–June, 2006 pp. 185–199 Facts, Fetishes, and the Parliament of Things: Is There any Space for Critique?
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2011-12-13 16:43:54


Open Document

File Size: 74,31 KB

Share Result on Facebook

Continent

Europe / /

Country

France / United States / Brazil / Columbia / India / /

/

Facility

Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta / University of Missouri-Columbia / /

IndustryTerm

constructed belief systems / relief networks / elaborate networks / literary technology / social technology / material technology / rhetorical device / problematic technology / steel / /

Movie

War of the Worlds / /

NaturalFeature

Amazon forest / /

Organization

Parliament of Things In / School of Literature / Communication / and Culture / Parliament of Things / University of Missouri / Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta / Department of Sociology / /

Person

Gilles Deleuze / Steve Fuller / Paul Ricouer / A. Prasad It / Steven Shapin / Prasad SrikanthMallavarapu / Francis Bruno Latour / Donna Haraway / Edward Said / Bruno Latour / Thomas Hobbes / Robert Boyle / Bertrand Russell / Simon Schaffer / Michel Foucault / Amit Prasad / Freud / Karl Marx / /

/

Position

speaker / suitable model for noncritical practice / spokesperson / priest / modern critic / author / art historian and a nonmodern anthropologist / anthropologist / Assistant Professor / material-semiotic actor / analyst / modern iconoclastic critic / /

ProvinceOrState

Karnataka / Missouri / Georgia / /

PublishedMedium

Body Politic / /

Region

south India / /

Technology

literary technology / problematic technology / social technology / /

SocialTag