SWORD, SHIELD, AND COMPASS: THE USES AND MISUSES OF RACIALLY POLARIZED VOTING STUDIES IN VOTING RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2012-10-15 11:42:29 Republican Party of Virginia Voting Rights Act Bush v. Vera Cumulative voting Gerrymandering Electronic voting Instant-runoff voting Shaw v. Reno Politics Case law Georgia v. Ashcroft		SWORD, SHIELD, AND COMPASS: THE USES AND MISUSES OF RACIALLY POLARIZED VOTING STUDIES IN VOTING RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT Add to Reading List Source URL: www.rutgerslawreview.com Download Document from Source Website File Size: 631,90 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Primer for reporters on redistricting & prison-based gerrymandering Who should use this primer: Reporters covering county or municipal redistricting in jurisdictions that contain prisons. What’s at stake: Counties and DocID: 1uPAj - View Document
	How the Efficiency Gap Works Eric Petry The efficiency gap is a standard for measuring partisan gerrymandering that is currently at the heart of the Wisconsin gerrymandering case, Whitford v. Nichol.1 Developed by Nichol DocID: 1uvph - View Document
	Illinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points – Feb. Update Goals:  Raise public awareness of gerrymandering as a key electionyear issue DocID: 1uftg - View Document
	Gerrymandering and Convexity Jonathan K. Hodge, Emily Marshall, and Geoff Patterson doi:074683410X510317 Jonathan Hodge () is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at Grand Valley State University DocID: 1t4w3 - View Document
	U.S. Census Bureau Attn: Karen Humes Re: Prison-Based Gerrymandering July 15, 2015 Dear Karen Humes, DocID: 1s4PG - View Document