Technomethodology: Paradoxes and Possibilities Graham Button and Paul Dourish Rank Xerox Research Centre Cambridge Laboratory (EuroPARC) 61 Regent Street Cambridge CB2 1AB

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2008-06-14 12:49:09 Humancomputer interaction Ethnomethodology Science Human communication Discourse analysis Harold Garfinkel Participatory design Computer-supported cooperative work Harvey Sacks Paul Dourish Conversation analysis Draft:Christian Heath		Technomethodology: Paradoxes and Possibilities Graham Button and Paul Dourish Rank Xerox Research Centre Cambridge Laboratory (EuroPARC) 61 Regent Street Cambridge CB2 1AB Add to Reading List Source URL: www.dourish.com Download Document from Source Website File Size: 81,71 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Microsoft Word - Radical empiricism in practiceEN.doc DocID: 1qiWW - View Document
	Flood, V. J., Harrer, B. W., & Abrahamson, D. (In press). The interactional work of configuring a mathematical object in a technologyenabled embodied learning environment. In C.-K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress, & P. Reimann DocID: 1pbYE - View Document
	Ethnomethodology and Usable Security: The Value of Descriptive Research for Graduate Students Hervé Saint-Louis, PhD Student, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto Instrumental, cognitive and behavioural approac DocID: 1oKnS - View Document
	Technomethodology: Paradoxes and Possibilities Graham Button and Paul Dourish Rank Xerox Research Centre Cambridge Laboratory (EuroPARC) 61 Regent Street Cambridge CB2 1AB DocID: 1nYdR - View Document
	A revised version of this paper appears in Human Computer Interaction, 13(4), 395–432, On “Technomethodology”: Foundational Relationships between Ethnomethodology and System Design Paul Dourish DocID: 1mWww - View Document