Cambridge capital controversy - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2009-03-19 01:49:16 Labour economics Marxist theory Supply and demand Distribution Marginal revenue productivity theory of wages Production function Envelope Cambridge capital controversy Fei–Ranis model of economic growth Economics Economic theories Microeconomics		Add to Reading List Source URL: crecimientoeconomico-asiain.weebly.com Download Document from Source Website File Size: 957,92 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Microsoft Word - RolM.doc DocID: 1oIlf - View Document
	Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 17, Number 4 —Fall 2003—Pages 227–235 Comments To be considered for publication in the Comments section, letters should be relatively short—generally DocID: 1ajCQ - View Document
	1 Book Review Economics of Space and Time: Scientific Papers of Tönu Puu, edited by Åke E. Andersson, Martin J. Beckmann, Karl-Gustaf Löfgren, and Anders Stenberg. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1997, xvii + 265 DocID: 1aeug - View Document
	The Aggregate Production Function: ‘Not Even Wrong’ DocID: 19XZ0 - View Document
	Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 17, Number 1—Winter 2003—Pages 199–214 Retrospectives Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? Avi J. Cohen and G. C. Harcourt DocID: 19Lnj - View Document