Polity Press / Cambridge University Press / Review / Sterling Housing Association Ltd / International Transport Roth GmbH / New Zealand Journal / Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd / Charter / Oxford University Press / Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited / /
Country
New Zealand / Canada / Australia / United Kingdom / / /
Event
Judicial Event / /
Facility
Ghaidan.54 The Momcilovic Court / Supreme Court / Monash University / /
IndustryTerm
impugned law / law principles / rights-incompatible law / /
Organization
Victorian Court of Appeal / Cambridge University / Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission / Momcilovic Court / Supreme Court / Evolving Court / Department of Justice / Monash University / Home Department / Castan Centre for Human Rights Law / House of Lords / Victorian Parliament / Faculty of Law / Mental Health Review Board / Court of Appeal / Oxford University / Human Rights Law Resource Centre / /
Person
Marius Smith / Vera Momcilovic / Slynn / Clyde / Simon McGregor / Lam Kwong Wai / Julie Debeljak / Velimir Markovski / Ghaidan / Hutton / Scott / Aileen Kavanagh / Walker / Bingham / Rodger / Anna Forsyth / Hoffman / Sarah Joseph / Steyn / /
Position
democratically-motivated and majoritarian executive / legislator / commentator / Secretary of State / Deputy Director / executive / Director of Public Prosecutions / Major / Lecturer / Attorney-General / judge / /
Who is sovereign now? The Momcilovic Court hands back power over human rights that Parliament intended it to have Julie Debeljak* The decision of R v Momcilovic concerned the rights-compatibility of a reverse legal burde