<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Market structure / Economy / Economics of regulation / Government / Law / Monopoly / Public choice theory / Regulatory economics / Deregulation / Competition law / Anti-competitive practices / United States antitrust law
Date: 2006-02-13 20:51:40
Market structure
Economy
Economics of regulation
Government
Law
Monopoly
Public choice theory
Regulatory economics
Deregulation
Competition law
Anti-competitive practices
United States antitrust law

Microsoft Word - dp0525.doc

Add to Reading List

Source URL: dirp4.pids.gov.ph

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 310,06 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Market structure / Economy / Economics of regulation / Government / Law / Monopoly / Public choice theory / Regulatory economics / Deregulation / Competition law / Anti-competitive practices / United States antitrust law

Microsoft Word - dp0525.doc

DocID: 1r45O - View Document

Anti-competitive behaviour / Business / Economy / Competition economics) / Cartel / Imperfect competition / Competition law / Anti-competitive practices / Mergers and acquisitions / Competition / European Union competition law / Competition law theory

  Competition  Policy  International   Combating  Cartels  in   Developing  Countries:   Implementation  Challenges  

DocID: 1qH2B - View Document

Economy / Finance / Business / Competition law / Mergers and acquisitions / Merger control / European Union law / Event study / UBS / Anti-competitive practices

*Technische Universität Berlin, Germany ** Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the SFB 649 "Economic Risk". http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de

DocID: 1qFQs - View Document

Competition law / Business / Anti-competitive behaviour / Professional studies / Marketing / Tying / Product bundling / Monopolization / Anti-competitive practices / Bundling / Market power / Monopoly

Unilateral Conduct Workbook Chapter 6: Tying and Bundling Prepared by The Unilateral Conduct Working Group

DocID: 1qFBp - View Document