<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Abuse / Human rights / Privacy / International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights / Freedom of speech / Hate speech / Defamation / Human rights in New Zealand / Legal aspects of computing / Ethics / Law / Censorship
Date: 2010-09-16 19:22:37
Abuse
Human rights
Privacy
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Freedom of speech
Hate speech
Defamation
Human rights in New Zealand
Legal aspects of computing
Ethics
Law
Censorship

21st
International
Congress
of
Historical
Sciences
(August
2010)
 –
Panel
“History
and
Human
Rights”
–
 
 
 


Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law-democracy.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 236,28 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

PROSECUTING JOURNALISTS AT THE SPECIAL TRIBUNAL FOR LEBANON: A CHALLENGE TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

PROSECUTING JOURNALISTS AT THE SPECIAL TRIBUNAL FOR LEBANON: A CHALLENGE TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

DocID: 1vaqN - View Document

Factsheet – Hate speech June 2018 This factsheet does not bind the Court and is not exhaustive Hate speech “Freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of [a democratic]

Factsheet – Hate speech June 2018 This factsheet does not bind the Court and is not exhaustive Hate speech “Freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of [a democratic]

DocID: 1uJEc - View Document

ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNING BOARDS OF UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES  Freedom of Speech onCampus

ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNING BOARDS OF UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES Freedom of Speech onCampus

DocID: 1u84V - View Document

●  Controlling Internet Content: Implications for CyberCyber-Speech International Conference on Freedom of Expression in Cyberspace

● Controlling Internet Content: Implications for CyberCyber-Speech International Conference on Freedom of Expression in Cyberspace

DocID: 1u5OS - View Document

`When was J.S. Mill’s On Liberty first published? Which other very famous book was published in the same year? What are the 4 main arguments that Mill uses in favour of extensive freedom of speech?

DocID: 1tkCB - View Document