Boca Raton / Beltsville / Ottawa / North Scituate / Québec / St. Joseph / Amsterdam / Toronto / Cary / Davis / Perth / Brisbane / New York / Madison / London / /
Company
Heslop L.C. / Lethbridge AB / Westview Press / N.B. L.C. / McKyes / Ecological Stratification Working Group / Potash / Oak Ridge National Laboratory / Westport / AVI Publishing Co. / CRC Press Inc. / /
Country
Netherlands / Canada / United States / /
Event
Business Partnership / /
Facility
Plant Nutrition / Canadian Institute of Food Science Technology Journal / K.W. Neatby Building / SAS Institute / University of Guelph / /
Holiday
St. Joseph / /
IndustryTerm
residue management / fine textured site / Energy analysis procedures / Energy conservation / overall potential energy savings / transportation / energy input / energy conservation programs / energy input data / Indirect energy use / inorganic fertilizer site / machinery / Energy data / energy use / present by-product / energy inputs / respective energy inputs / human energy / higher energy inputs / energy savings / food / energy / energy component / fossil fuel energy / Energy considerations / production energy analysis / energy consumption / Direct energy use / machinery factor / food production / Indirect energy inputs / lower energy input / energy requirements / typical production systems / annual potential energy savings / unit product / Energy analysis model / Energy efficiencies / energy analysis / Energy efficiency / higher input energy / energy calculations / input products / energy productivity / higher specific energy / energy coefficients / potential energy savings / field machinery / Direct energy inputs / farm machinery / soil texture site / food sectors / lower total energy / oil / medium textured site / higher fuel consumption energy / Energy exclusions / input energy / indirect energy requirement / energy content / mechanical energy / energy factor / energy balance / energy saving practices / energy cost / output/input energy ratios / non-renewable energy resources / machinery depreciation energy / potential annual energy savings / energy requirement / indirect energy requirements / tillage machinery / energy value / reasonable transportation distance / manure applic-ation equipment / /
MusicGroup
A.F. / B.C. / /
NaturalFeature
Richelieu / Great Lakes / Lawrence River Valley / /
Organization
School of Engineering / Canadian Institute / University of Guelph / Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre / Soil Landscape Unit / 4Upper Thames River Conservation Authority / Ontario Ministry / Ministry of Agriculture / Centre for Land / Information and Document Centre / American Society of Agronomy / Research Centre / SAS Institute / U.S. Department of Agriculture / Policy Analysis Directorate / 2Greenhouse and Processing Crops Research Centre / Canadian Agricultural Research Council / Environment Directorate / /
Person
D. Hayman / S.D. Murphy / D.J. Hume / P. Van Bodegom / D.J. King / G.C. Watson / N.B. McLaughlin / H. Kohl / G.J. Wall / Swanton / C. Brown / D.R. Clements / B.A. Grant / /
Position
producer / D.J. / KING / representative / King / D.J. / surface representative / /
ProvinceOrState
Quebec / New Brunswick / Saskatchewan / M.B. / South Carolina / Ontario / Iowa / /
PublishedMedium
Extrapolation / /
Region
southwestern Saskatchewan / Central Pennsylvania / South Western Ontario / /
Comparison of energy inputs for inorganic fertilizer and manure based corn production N.B. McLAUGHLIN1, A. HIBA 2, G.J. WALL3 and D.J. KING4 1 Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Research Branch, Agriculture and