Mac’s Shell Services Inc. / Shell Oil Products Co. / Chicken Delight Inc. / Mac's Shell Service Inc. / Dersch Energies Inc. / Shell Oil Co. / Did Postal Instant Press / Sealy / State Oil Co. / /
Country
United Kingdom / /
Currency
USD / /
Facility
Hebrew University of Jerusalem / Columbia University / Supreme Court / University of California / /
Columbia University / RUTGERS / United States Supreme Court / University of California / Berkeley / U.S. Supreme Court / Court of Appeals / Hebrew University of Jerusalem / Academic Center of Law & Business / /
Person
Tamar Frankel / Shankar Ganesan / Jan B. Heide / Francine Lafontaine / Jody L. Crosno / Antony Dnes / Scott A. Shane / ROBERT D. BLAIR / George John / CODE ANN / ANNE T. COUGHLAN ET AL / James White / Emily Schaeffer / Robert K. Kry / Eyal Zamir / Robert Ping / Benjamin Klein / Warren S. Grimes / James A. Brickley / Patrick J. Kaufmann / James R. Brown / Antony W. Dnes / STAN L. REV / Rupert Barkoff / Robert T. Justis / Erin Anderson / Mary deLeo / /
Position
General / Assistant Professor / dealer / /
ProvinceOrState
New Jersey / Nebraska / Wisconsin / Minnesota / Virginia / Illinois / Indiana / Hawaii / Connecticut / Washington / Michigan / Delaware / California / Iowa / Arkansas / /
RETHINKING THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S ABANDONMENT REQUIREMENT IN MAC’S SHELL SERVICE INC. V. SHELL OIL PRODUCTS Uri Benoliel* Abstract Assume a franchisor takes destructive economic actions toward his