<--- Back to Details
| First Page | Document Content | |
|---|---|---|
 Date: 2008-10-31 10:36:52Containers Pharmacy English case law Negligence Phenol Re Polemis & Furniss Withy & Co Ltd Roe v Minister of Health Law Tort law Ampoule |
Add to Reading List |
BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES TO CLOSING ARGUMENT OF DR. CHARLES SMITH![Monash University High School Mooting Competition CASE SUMMARIES DUTY OF CARE A duty of care was originally established by applying Lord Atkin’s ‘neighbour principle’ test from Donoghue v Stevenson[removed]You shou](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/8ab9fb30b4f05e953530ceb05ef3f288.jpg "Monash University High School Mooting Competition CASE SUMMARIES DUTY OF CARE A duty of care was originally established by applying Lord Atkin’s ‘neighbour principle’ test from Donoghue v Stevenson[removed]You shou") | Monash University High School Mooting Competition CASE SUMMARIES DUTY OF CARE A duty of care was originally established by applying Lord Atkin’s ‘neighbour principle’ test from Donoghue v Stevenson[removed]You shouDocID: 11oIM - View Document |
| BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES TO CLOSING ARGUMENT OF DR. CHARLES SMITHDocID: FyXU - View Document |