Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Independent expenditure / Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission / Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act / Buckley v. Valeo / First Amendment to the United States Constitution / Campaign finance evolution / Campaign finance reform in the United States / Federal Election Commission / Politics / Elections in the United States


Analysis of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and its Impact on Alaska Campaign Finance Laws
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2010-02-22 15:45:41


Open Document

File Size: 43,22 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

New York / /

Company

Valeo / /

Country

United States / /

Currency

USD / /

IndustryTerm

disclosure law / federal law / express communications / campaign finance law commentators / particular federal law / campaign finance laws / campaign finance jurisprudence / satellite communications / disclaimer law / federal campaign finance laws / disclaimer law requiring / campaign finance law / /

Organization

Congress / United States Supreme Court / Staff office of the Governor DATE / federal government / Federal Election Commission / UN Court / MEMORANDUM STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF LAW TO / Alaska Public Offices Commission / /

Person

Mike Nizich / /

PoliticalEvent

a primary / general election / /

Position

candidate / group / campaign consultant / candidate for federal office / candidate / a candidate / Attorney General / deputy campaign treasurer / campaign treasurer / Chief / /

ProvinceOrState

Minnesota / Alaska / Alaska.6 / Oregon / /

Technology

satellite communications / /

SocialTag