Exercise 11: Counting 1 The goal of this exercise is to understand the consistency properties of the bounded max register implementation from the lecture. a) Show that if one always writes to R< if i < M , regardless of

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2015-01-14 07:29:22 Concurrency control Computing Computer architecture Computer engineering Linearizability Safe semantics Processor register Shared register Atomic semantics		Exercise 11: Counting 1 The goal of this exercise is to understand the consistency properties of the bounded max register implementation from the lecture. a) Show that if one always writes to R< if i < M , regardless of Add to Reading List Source URL: resources.mpi-inf.mpg.de Download Document from Source Website File Size: 106,33 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Exercise 11: Counting 1 The goal of this exercise is to understand the consistency properties of the bounded max register implementation from the lecture. a) Show that if one always writes to R< if i < M , regardless of DocID: 1rr1Z - View Document
	Aspects Made Explicit for Safe Transactional Semantics Kevin Hoffman Purdue University 1. Introduction DocID: 1m8nb - View Document
	Macros as Multi-Stage Computations: Type-Safe, Generative, Binding Macros in MacroML ∗ Steven E. Ganz † DocID: 15AWZ - View Document
	Safe\|A Semantic Technique for Transforming Programs in the Presence of Errors ALEXANDER AIKEN University of California, Berkeley and JOHN H. WILLIAMS and EDWARD L. WIMMERS DocID: 13Zvt - View Document
	Safe Formulas in the General Theory of Stable Models (Preliminary Report) Joohyung Lee1 , Vladimir Lifschitz2 , and Ravi Palla1 1 2 DocID: Q3nT - View Document