Strasbourg / Jerusalem / Stockholm / Washington / D.C. / Cambridge / London / /
Company
Swedish Court Structure Sweden / /
Continent
Europe / /
Country
Germany / Italy / Sweden / /
Facility
Stockholm Institute / Supreme Court / European Court of Human Rights / /
Holiday
Commonwealth Day / /
IndustryTerm
interest / law-making / law-making process / proposed law / draft law / fundamental law / family law cases / law clerks / media cases / law traditions / judicial systems / overall management / Criminal law / Law graduates / /
Organization
Supreme Court / Administrative Agency / Moderate Party / Ministry of Justice / Committee of Ministers / United Nations General Assembly / Council on Legislation / Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law / Supreme Administrative Court / Consultative Council of European Judges / Swedish Judges Association / National Disciplinary Board / Constitutional Court / Swedish Parliament / United Nations / UN Court / Berlusconi government / European Commission / Court of Appeal / European Union / Council of Europe Publishing / European Court of Human Rights / Council of Europe / /
Person
Thomas Bull / John Bell / Susanne Eberstein / Anti Avsan / John Adenitire Intern / /
Position
head of a particular administration / associate judge / judicious and careful official / president / chairman and a vice-chairman / assistant judge / professional judge / Chancellor / sponsoring minister / secretary / Director General / permanent judge / qualified judge / Governor / appeal court judge / Executive / presiding judge / representative / legal advisors / current Director General / assistant / president / the Chancellor / judge / /
Judicial Independence in Europe The Swedish, Italian and German Perspectives John Adenitire Intern, Judicial Independence Project Table of Contents