First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
Date: 2011-09-06 15:55:38Canada Cooper v. Hobart Duty of care Kamloops (City) v. Nielsen Anns v Merton London Borough Council Negligence Tort English tort law Caparo Industries plc v Dickman Law Case law Tort law | Regulatory Negligence and Administrative Law (C0245433.DOC;2)Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.ciaj-icaj.caDownload Document from Source WebsiteFile Size: 272,34 KBShare Document on Facebook |
384 Singapore Academy of Law Journal (1996)DocID: 1aWhe - View Document | |
5 S.Ac.L.J. Notes and Comments 355DocID: 1aSHI - View Document | |
Microsoft Word - QCA05-405.rtfDocID: 15IHv - View Document | |
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Jen & Anor v BarnesQSC 418 PARTIES:DocID: 140oB - View Document | |
Monash University High School Mooting Competition CASE SUMMARIES DUTY OF CARE A duty of care was originally established by applying Lord Atkin’s ‘neighbour principle’ test from Donoghue v Stevenson[removed]You shouDocID: 11oIM - View Document |