Around the country, the question of whether a defendant is competent to stand trial is being raised more often in juvenile court proceedings. However, most states lack statutory guidance for how competence to stand trial - Cooper v. Oklahoma - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	Around the country, the question of whether a defendant is competent to stand trial is being raised more often in juvenile court proceedings. However, most states lack statutory guidance for how competence to stand trial Add to Reading List Document Date: 2012-11-29 13:57:35 Open Document File Size: 772,64 KB Share Result on Facebook City Washington / DC / / Company Roper / Dusky / Simmons / J.D.B. v. / / Country United States / / / Event Product Issues / / IndustryTerm rehabilitative services / civil legal systems / clinical services / criminal systems / / Organization American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law / In court / UN Court / Supreme Court / D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation / / Person Anette McGaha / / / Position attorney / counsel / judge / a prosecutor / and a defense attorney / defense counsel / lawyer / / Product perspectives / / ProgrammingLanguage DC / / ProvinceOrState Alabama / Oklahoma / Florida / North Carolina / / PublishedMedium the Models for Change guide / / URL www.modelsforchange.net / www.njjn.org / http / SocialTag Competency evaluation Evidence law Competence Dusky v. United States Juvenile court Indiana v. Edwards Cooper v. Oklahoma Forensic psychology Law Mental health law

Around the country, the question of whether a defendant is competent to stand trial is being raised more often in juvenile court proceedings. However, most states lack statutory guidance for how competence to stand trialAdd to Reading List