Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Civil engineering / Technology / Wood preservation / Railroad tie / Utility pole / Lumber / Track / Deep foundation / Concrete / Construction / Wood / Structural engineering


A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Creosote-Treated Wood vs. Non-Treated Wood Materials Stephen T. Smith, P.E.1 January 2007 Introduction Creosote-treated wood products have been a vital part of our nation’s physical infrastru
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2007-01-18 00:05:42


Open Document

File Size: 2,75 MB

Share Result on Facebook

Company

Coastal / Reed Construction Data Inc. / Puget / Utility Sold Waste Activities Group / Stratus Consulting / /

Country

United States / /

Currency

USD / /

Event

Natural Disaster / /

Facility

Western Wood Preservers Institute / /

IndustryTerm

energy recovery / aquatic applications / steel ties / food chain / fiberglass release plasticizers / communication services / steel releases significant amounts / track systems / marine applications / creosote-treated wood products / energy input / Steel and plastic crossties / track using steel / wood products / manufacturing base / treatment technology / technology approaching / crosstie technologies / fiberglass / physical infrastructure / steel crossties / higher transportation / steel / /

Organization

U.S. Forest Service / Timber Piling Council / U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / American Wood Preservers Institute Government Affair Committee / USDA Forest Service / United States Navy / Western Wood Preservers Institute / North American Wood Pole Coalition / Railway Tie Association / Environmental Protection Agency / /

Person

Stephen T. Smith / Jim Gauntt / /

Position

author / plant engineer / corporate environmental manager / Chairman / author for projected savings / representative / consultant / /

Region

southeastern U.S. / /

Technology

alternative crosstie technologies / treatment technology / corrosion protection / /

URL

www.wwpinstitute.org / http /

SocialTag