First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
Date: 2014-09-02 10:25:47United States v. Booker United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Gall v. United States Mandatory sentencing Fair Sentencing Act Plea bargain Rita v. United States Kimbrough v. United States Law United States criminal procedure Criminal procedure | Selected Post Booker and Guideline Application DecisionsAdd to Reading ListSource URL: www.ussc.govDownload Document from Source WebsiteFile Size: 842,32 KBShare Document on Facebook |
Case: Document: Page: 1DocID: 1pL6K - View Document | |
Testimony of Marc Mauer Executive Director The Sentencing Project Prepared for the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland SecurityDocID: 1oNDH - View Document | |
Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNWDocID: 1my60 - View Document | |
BENEFIT & COST SAVINGS: THE SMARTER SENTENCING ACT of 2015 H.RLabrador-Scott) – SLee-Durbin) The bipartisan Smarter Sentencing Act has numerous benefits for taxpayers: it would increase fairness in the crDocID: 1ayOi - View Document | |
SMARTER SENTENCING ACT (Senate March 17, Page: S1576] ‐‐‐ Mr. LEE. Madam President, we rise today to speak in favor of the Smarter Sentencing Act, a bipartisan pieceDocID: 1arBG - View Document |