<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Logic / Truthmaker / Supervenience / Physicalism / David Malet Armstrong / Modal logic / Universal / Problem of universals / Reality / Philosophy / Metaphysics / Ontology
Date: 2006-02-07 06:47:16
Logic
Truthmaker
Supervenience
Physicalism
David Malet Armstrong
Modal logic
Universal
Problem of universals
Reality
Philosophy
Metaphysics
Ontology

Microsoft Word - Innentitelei.doc

Add to Reading List

Source URL: metaphysica.de

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 1,39 MB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

What’s Wrong with Strong Necessities? Philip Goff and David Papineau 1 The Significance of Strong Necessities 1.1 Conceivability and PossibilityDavid Chalmers’ challenge to physicalism has dominated the philosophy of

What’s Wrong with Strong Necessities? Philip Goff and David Papineau 1 The Significance of Strong Necessities 1.1 Conceivability and PossibilityDavid Chalmers’ challenge to physicalism has dominated the philosophy of

DocID: 1viEA - View Document

The Cartesian argument against physicalism Philip Goff I’m an analytic metaphysician who thinks analytic metaphysicians don’t think enough about consciousness. By consciousness I mean the property of being a thing su

The Cartesian argument against physicalism Philip Goff I’m an analytic metaphysician who thinks analytic metaphysicians don’t think enough about consciousness. By consciousness I mean the property of being a thing su

DocID: 1uPMG - View Document

Paul Løvland  Physicalism Begs the Question and Violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics Physicalism is critically assessed from a natural scientific viewpoint, and its basic

Paul Løvland Physicalism Begs the Question and Violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics Physicalism is critically assessed from a natural scientific viewpoint, and its basic

DocID: 1uP2T - View Document

A note on the completeness of ‘physics’ David Spurrett & David Papineau 1. One argument for physicalism states that all physical effects are due to physical causes, and hence that anything having physical effects mus

A note on the completeness of ‘physics’ David Spurrett & David Papineau 1. One argument for physicalism states that all physical effects are due to physical causes, and hence that anything having physical effects mus

DocID: 1uCc7 - View Document

After Physicalism edited by BENEDIKT PAUL GÖCKE

After Physicalism edited by BENEDIKT PAUL GÖCKE

DocID: 1uxCS - View Document