| Document Date: 2013-01-19 13:20:27
Open Document File Size: 72,92 KBShare Result on Facebook
City St. Paul / Minneapolis / / Company Bioplasty Inc. / Minute Maid / Procter & Gamble / U.S. Food and Drug Administration / / Event Legal Issues / Diplomatic Relations / / IndustryTerm advertised products / food labeling rules / false advertising cases / agency advertising regulations / food name / false advertising / orange juice advertising / fresh product / processed food product labels / food products / usual food name / pasteurized orange juice products / processed meat products / fresher tasting product / food / orange juice products / frozen poultry products / advertising consistency / food safety / unambiguous advertising / beverage labels / processed food product / orange juice advertising label / advertising regulations / law / false and deceptive advertising claims / / MedicalCondition breast cancer / high cholesterol / / MedicalTreatment breast implantation / breast implants / breast implantations / breast implant / / NaturalFeature Citrus Hill / / Organization U.S. Department of Agriculture / U.S. Food and Drug Administration / Food Safety / / Person Jeff Nesbit / David Kessler / / Position federal judge / spokesperson / commissioner / / Product Citrus Hill / / ProvinceOrState Minnesota / Florida / /
SocialTag |
Putting the Squeeze on Citrus Hill Orange Juice By Tom Beauchamp In April 1991 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) charged Procter & Gamble in federal court with fraud and violation of the 1963 Food and