Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the - Decision rule - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Add to Reading List Document Date: 2014-11-26 10:35:57 Open Document File Size: 216,80 KB Share Result on Facebook City BRADFORD / / Company Quantum Systems Inc. / Specialty Connectors Co. Inc. / P. ADAM DAVIS Davis & Sarbinoff LLP / Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. / INDIANA HARRIS AUTO RECONDITIONING SERVICES INC. / Appellant-Plaintiff Harris Auto Reconditioning Services Inc. / / Country Lebanon / / Event Legal Issues / Judicial Event / / Facility THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA HARRIS AUTO RECONDITIONING SERVICES INC. / St. Mary Medical Center / / Organization UN Court / Medical Center / Purdue Univ. / Worker’s Compensation Board / / Person Appellee-Defendant Brian Wolfe / CASE / BRIAN WOLFE / KEVIN L. MOYER / / Position ATTORNEY / counsel / Clerk / Judge / / ProvinceOrState Indiana / / SocialTag Civil procedure Lawsuit Interrogatories Law Motion Discovery

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or theAdd to Reading List