Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2014-12-23 10:08:39 Criminal law Terry v. Ohio Terry stop Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Reasonable suspicion Frisking Minnesota v. Dickerson Knowles v. Iowa Traffic stop Searches and seizures Law Law enforcement in the United States		Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Add to Reading List Source URL: www.in.gov Download Document from Source Website File Size: 170,89 KB Share Document on Facebook

	NYC: STOP-AND-FRISK DOWN SAFETY DocID: 1r9in - View Document
	An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force DocID: 1r70B - View Document
	[Cite as State v. Dickerson, 179 Ohio App.3d 754, 2008-OhioIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY DocID: 1r4aA - View Document
	An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force DocID: 1pLMG - View Document
	SUPPORTING MATERIAL FOR WILLIAMS AD ON JIM KENNEYAUDIO/VIDEO CITATION “We now have discussions, ironically, about no longer letting police officers use pepper gas. I mean, come on. You can’t use the flashli DocID: 1aUgn - View Document