Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the - Decision rule - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Add to Reading List Document Date: 2015-01-23 09:42:32 Open Document File Size: 238,89 KB Share Result on Facebook City Dayton / / Event Judicial Event / / Facility THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA ATAUL SHAFEEK / / IndustryTerm law-abiding life / / Organization COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA ATAUL SHAFEEK / / Person Shaun Ali / Case / David A. Kolger / George Parker / Edmund Haskins / Ataul Shafeek / Jr. / KENNETH E. BIGGINS / ADAM G. FORREST / Jazamine Allen / Chidester Richmond / / Position ATTORNEY / forensic psychiatrist / GREGORY F. ZOELLER Attorney General / Judge / Deputy Attorney General / / ProvinceOrState Ohio / Indiana / / SocialTag Insanity defense Mental health law Appeal Law Criminology Forensic psychiatry

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Add to Reading List