Foreword Metrics evoke a mixed reaction from the research community. A commitment to using data and evidence to inform decisions makes many of us sympathetic, even enthusiastic, about the prospect of granular, real-time

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2015-07-08 19:01:54 Academia Publishing Bibliometrics Academic publishing Scholarly communication Knowledge Department for Business Innovation and Skills Science policy College and university rankings ORCID Impact factor Evaluation		Foreword Metrics evoke a mixed reaction from the research community. A commitment to using data and evidence to inform decisions makes many of us sympathetic, even enthusiastic, about the prospect of granular, real-time Add to Reading List Source URL: www.hefce.ac.uk Download Document from Source Website File Size: 1,07 MB Share Document on Facebook

	COMMENTARY World university rankings and subject ranking in engineering and technology (2015–2016): a case for greater transparency M. K. Surappa There has been a great deal of interest in the ranking of academic and DocID: 1rmjq - View Document
	India University Rankings 2016 National Institutional Ranking (NIR) Framework1 was created by the Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India on 9th October, 2014. T DocID: 1rexJ - View Document
	ENVISIONING VIRGINIA TECH BEYOND BOUNDARIES CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY RANKED UNIVERSITIES IN THE TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION (THE) WORLD UNIVERISTY RANKINGS PREPARED BY: DocID: 1r293 - View Document
	World University and Subject Ranking in Engineering and Technology): A case for greater transparency M. K. SURAPPA, Department of Materials Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India The DocID: 1r1B8 - View Document
	The linguistic implications of academic performance indicators: general trends and case study MICHELE GAZZOLA* Abstract DocID: 1qWKg - View Document