<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Discursive dilemma / Paradoxes / Social choice theory / Social epistemology / Stare decisis / Common law / Contract / Ratio decidendi / Precedent / Law / Case law / Dilemmas
Date: 2014-09-21 20:48:00
Discursive dilemma
Paradoxes
Social choice theory
Social epistemology
Stare decisis
Common law
Contract
Ratio decidendi
Precedent
Law
Case law
Dilemmas

Microsoft Word - Gageler and Lim[removed]Advance

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.law.unimelb.edu.au

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 303,11 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Sanford Goldberg Lectures on Social Epistemology Tuesday, July 19th

DocID: 1vlhC - View Document

The Independence Thesis: When Individual and Social Epistemology Diverge Conor Mayo-Wilson Kevin J.S. Zollman

DocID: 1uYbH - View Document

Solving the Problem of Nearly Convergent Knowledge Chris Tweedt Forthcoming in Social Epistemology Abstract. The Problem of Nearly Convergent Knowledge is an updated and stronger version of the Problem of Convergent Know

DocID: 1unZ1 - View Document

Richard W. Moodey “Performing Knowing: A Reply to Collins” __________________ Moody, Richard W. “Performing Knowing: A Reply to Collins.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no): ht

DocID: 1thoL - View Document

Sandstrom, GregoryLaws of media – The four effects: A McLuhan contribution to social epistemology. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (12): 1-6 http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-uc Laws of media – The four

DocID: 1teZI - View Document