On April 11, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that PPG did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,013,234, which relates to certain essentially sph - Doctrine of equivalents - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	On April 11, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that PPG did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,013,234, which relates to certain essentially sph Add to Reading List Document Date: 2005-05-05 15:17:20 Open Document File Size: 176,17 KB Share Result on Facebook Company Rhodia / UPDATE Rhodia Chimie & Rhodia Inc. / / / Organization UN Court / / Person Lawrence M. Sung / / / SocialTag Rhodia Claim Patent Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Patent law Doctrine of equivalents Law

On April 11, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that PPG did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,013,234, which relates to certain essentially sphAdd to Reading List