<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Champagne / Doctrine of foreign equivalents / Sparkling wine / Trademark / Confusion in Canadian trademark law / Palm Bay Imports /  Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en / Wine / French wine / Veuve Clicquot
Date: 2013-10-21 10:38:57
Champagne
Doctrine of foreign equivalents
Sparkling wine
Trademark
Confusion in Canadian trademark law
Palm Bay Imports
Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en
Wine
French wine
Veuve Clicquot

396 F.3d[removed]F.3d 1369, 73 U.S.P.Q.2d[removed]Cite as: 396 F.3d[removed]Briefs and Other Related Documents United States Court of Appeals,

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.frosszelnick.com

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 191,18 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Microsoft Word - Judgment - Orange Brand v Account Works.doc

Microsoft Word - Judgment - Orange Brand v Account Works.doc

DocID: Y8Hq - View Document

Microsoft Word[removed]

Microsoft Word[removed]

DocID: Xdtu - View Document

TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (CAP[removed]APPLICATION NO. :  [removed]

TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (CAP[removed]APPLICATION NO. : [removed]

DocID: SUSb - View Document

PDF Document

DocID: L6Vi - View Document

396 F.3d[removed]F.3d 1369, 73 U.S.P.Q.2d[removed]Cite as: 396 F.3d[removed]Briefs and Other Related Documents United States Court of Appeals,

396 F.3d[removed]F.3d 1369, 73 U.S.P.Q.2d[removed]Cite as: 396 F.3d[removed]Briefs and Other Related Documents United States Court of Appeals,

DocID: fJXM - View Document