Doe v. Reed and the Future of Disclosure Requirements Steve Simpson* Introduction In Doe v. Reed, the Supreme Court waded into the contentious politics of gay marriage to decide whether government-mandated

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2012-12-10 20:57:43 Direct democracy United States Same-sex marriage in the United States LGBT rights in California Doe v. Reed Washington Referendum 71 California Proposition 8 Referendum Independent expenditure Elections Politics of the United States Politics		Doe v. Reed and the Future of Disclosure Requirements Steve Simpson* Introduction In Doe v. Reed, the Supreme Court waded into the contentious politics of gay marriage to decide whether government-mandated Add to Reading List Source URL: object.cato.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 126,45 KB Share Document on Facebook

	DecemberNAVIGATING THE SYSTEM: A Know-Your-Rights Guide for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Elders in California DocID: 1qTB1 - View Document
	Are Blacks and Latinos Responsible for the Passage of Proposition 8? Analyzing Voter Attitudes on California’s Proposal to Ban Same-Sex Marriage in 2008 Marisa Abrajano University of California San Diego 9500 Gilman Dr DocID: 1qzlc - View Document
	The Peace and Freedom Party says: Vote NO on Propositions 73–78 Proposition 73 attacks the privacy rights and reproductive freedom of young DocID: 1q5Mk - View Document
	APPENDIX L3 AFFIDAVIT FOR ENROLLMENT OF DOMESTIC PARTNERS (Articles 22, 22A, and 23 – Paid Benefits) Foothill-De Anza Community College District I, ______________________________________________, _____________________, DocID: 1q4HR - View Document
	Microsoft Word - s147999.doc DocID: 1onae - View Document