Washington / DC / Detroit / New York City / Venice / /
Company
John Wiley & Sons Ltd. / Fuji / /
Country
United States / /
Currency
USD / /
IndustryTerm
hypothetical antagonist treatment technology / systematic accounting concepts / AIDS treatment / treatment services / transportation / case management / comparison / few additional services / insurance / month telephone survey / health care systems / abuse treatment services / minimal services / law enforcement / social services / managed care systems / drug treatment services / important tool / direct treatment services / ancillary non-treatment services / given carrier / /
Organization
UCLA / Oregon’s office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Programs / Division of Epidemiology / Services / and Prevention Research / Detroit police / Federal government / US Public Health Service / U.S. Government / National Institute on Drug Abuse / California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs / /
Person
Van Steel / Harrison Act / William S. Cartwright / /
Position
author / Health Economist / Services Research Branch / representative / analyst / /
Product
Mauser / /
ProgrammingLanguage
DC / /
ProvinceOrState
Wisconsin / Columbia.11 The / Maryland / Oregon / California / /
The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics J. Mental Health Policy Econ. 3, 11–Cost–Benefit Analysis of Drug Treatment Services: Review of the Literature† William S. Cartwright*