The Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Outcome Monitoring Project (COMPare) Protocol Ben Goldacre, Henry Drysdale, Carl Heneghan CEBM, University of Oxford compare

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2016-01-25 14:11:46 Medical research Research Health Clinical research Clinical trials Academic publishing Systematic review Research methods Reporting bias ClinicalTrials.gov Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Trials		The Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Outcome Monitoring Project (COMPare) Protocol Ben Goldacre, Henry Drysdale, Carl Heneghan CEBM, University of Oxford compare Add to Reading List Source URL: compare-trials.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 243,47 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Whose Knowledge is Constructed? Authentic Research and Reporting Bias The biographical journeys of researchers and journalists greatly influence their values, beliefs, their research questions and the knowledge they cons DocID: 1vkrw - View Document
	Pre-Registration, Pre-analysis, and Transparent Reporting: Perspectives from biomedical research Maya Petersen Divs. of Biostatistics and Epidemiology DocID: 1rqnz - View Document
	PRISMA NMA Checklist of Items to Include When Reporting A Systematic Review Involving a Network Meta-analysis Section/Topic TITLE Title DocID: 1rnsf - View Document
	Evidence and impact of publication bias Dr Emily S Sena Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh @camarades_ DocID: 1rgdO - View Document
	PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocolschecklist: recommended items to address in a systematic review protocol* Section and topic Item No DocID: 1rfPT - View Document